How Biden & Democrats in Congress has weaponized and politized the DOJ & FBI with a complicit media in the biggest abuse of political power in US history in their quest to indict a former President


The U.S. Constitution and the rights, freedoms and privileges guaranteed by it to its citizens and lawful residents are under attack by a cabal consisting of the Biden administration, Democratic party, their political allies in the media along with individuals, groups, and organizations (commonly called the “cancel culture”). This collective cabal have demonstrated, through their actions of ignoring the Constitutional rights of citizens and established laws, hostility to the evolving history, traditions, institutions, and legacy of the United States of America, which has historically recognized its problems and imperfections, and historically recognized the need for change and continued improvement through peaceful assembly, free discussion, and free debate for the benefit and betterment of its citizens and its lawful residents.

This “cancel culture” cabal are a political instrument of both the Biden Administration and the Democratic party to unilaterally demand (often through violent protests and property destruction by mob action) changes to the history, culture, and institutions of the United States of America based on their radical ideology and political narrative to change America, without considering opposing views and narratives, thus electing not to pursue a consensus traditionally achieved through the  democratic process of discussion, debate, and voting, as contemplated by the  U. S. Constitution, and electing instead to use force and unconstitutional means to achieve their (“cancel culture’s”) goals.

In a June 2022, interview on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures,” Allan Dershowitz, a constitutional law expert, warned of the dangers of the Cancel culture and said some liberals have become radical censors of free speech and blasted the “new McCarthyism” of the Democrats’ “hard left.” 1

“Common Cause, which purports to be a liberal, not a radical organization, has now demanded that Facebook keep Donald Trump off its platform,” he said. “We are getting liberals… [calling for] Fox News [to be] taken off the networks. I hated communism but I defended the rights of lawyers to defend accused communists.” 2

The current Congressional January 6th hearings exemplifies the warning by Dershowitz of the dangers of the cancel culture cabal by the actions of the Democratic Leadership in Congress. I believe this is the final piece of the Hillary-DNC-Obama-Biden Machiavellian conspiracy plan in achieving their final goal of consolidating their power in their attempt to destroy the American First movement, the Republican party, and former President Trump and his supporters. By conducting a one-sided sham Show trial in the spirit of the famous Moscow Trials of the Great Purge period during the late 1930s by Stalin has exposed the Democrats in criminalizing political discourse by using the power of the State repressing political opponents and those who disagree with the mob of the cancel culture.

For the last five and half years President Trump has been subjected to a two- year criminal investigation by DOJ SC Mueller team of allegations that Trump and members of his team colluded with the Russians, two prior impeachment attempts by Democratic Congressional leadership and now their current January 6 Congressional committee investigation. Committe members have told the media they have enough evidence to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department recommending charges that former President Donald J. Trump and some of his allies might have conspired to commit fraud and obstruction by misleading Americans about the outcome of the 2020 election and attempting to overturn the result.

In a court filing in a civil case in California, the committee’s lawyers for the first time laid out their theory of a potential criminal case against the former president Trump. They said they had accumulated evidence demonstrating that Mr. Trump, the conservative lawyer John Eastman and other allies could potentially be charged with criminal violations including obstructing an official proceeding of Congress and conspiracy to defraud the American people. The filing also said there was evidence that Mr. Trump’s repeated lies that the election had been stolen amounted to common law fraud. 3  

This is biggest con job ever perpetrated on the American public, as the Democrats in in their continued pursuit of Trump are recycling the same talking points used in the first and second impeachment hearings. What ironic there using the same modus operandi as the conspirators used in the Hillary-DNC-Obama false flag disinformation hoax against Trump, “guilt by association” as purported in the first two sub stack articles laying out a prima facia case in answering the 5 W’s and the how questions of the greatest corruption conspiracy scandal in US history. 4 5


The articles of impeachment alleged President Trump comments at the protest on January 6, 2020, incited insurrection among Trump supporters.

Democratic House Mangers proclaimed President Trump on January 6, 2020, during his speech to his supporters promoted false claims to his supporters there was a conspiracy, that the 2020 election was rigged and that he won this election in a landslide.

Democrat house managers alleged “armed insurrection” based upon the false assertion (media reporting) that Capital Police Officer (Sicknick) was struck in the head with a fire extinguisher and that none of those that entered the capitol were armed. In fact, the only death that occurred that day was the shooting death of an unarmed female veteran who was shot and killed by a Capitol Police Lieutenant. The officer was cleared by DOJ and in media interviews he admitted he never gave her a command warning to stop before he shot her.

Democratic house managers doctored and cherry-picked video segments of President Trump comments on January 6, 2020, and Charlottesville alleging he had incited the mob and condone white supremist, yet the managers left out in their presentations that “President Trump had addressed the protesters and called on the assembled to march peacefully and patriotically make your voice heard and had condemned White supremist.

Democratic house managers alleged that President Trump incited the mob by his comments to the crowd.

So far in the first day of Congressional hearings the Democrats have produced a one-sided media production, of selectively edited video segments showing the mob breeching of the capitol where some of the videos were shown in the first impeachment trial of Trump.

What the Jan 6th committee has failed to disclose to the public is that there are other videos that the DOJ and the FBI has its possession that they have yet to release to the public, that shows members of the capitol police opening up doors and inviting protesters into the Captial building.

Congresswomen Cheney accused Trump of dereliction of duty by being silence for three hours of not taking any actions while the capitol was being breeched by members of the mob.

What Cheney failed to mention in her presentation was four days before the breech of Congress, President Trump based upon security intelligence reports of a potential breech by a sinister group of protesters of the Capitol, Trump offered 10,000-20,000 national guard troops to both Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the Mayor of Baltimore, Muriel Bowser for protection of the Capitol building, but that both Pelosi and Bower declined Trump offer to protect the Capitol. 6

Cheney in her January 6 presentation read a tweet during the hearing from former President Trump but omitted the final sentences where Trump told the protesters to “go home with love and in peace. Remember this day forever” Cheney stop reading the Trump tweet before the omitted sentence and shows how Cheney deceptively edited Trump tweet to mislead and deceive the public in giving the appearance that Trump supported the actions of those whose breech the capitol. Even MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow admitted that Trump’s speech at the rally did not result in the breach at the Capitol. 7

The committee has promise in connecting the dots from President Trump to the recently indicted proud boys and oath keepers but thus far has failed in their efforts to do so. Phone calls by the Proud boys or oath keepers into the White House is guilt by association evidence and not evidence of a conspiratorial agreement. I would like to point out in the Mueller investigation of Trump, Mueller’s team ignored exculpatory information when they learned early on in their investigation that the Trump campaign never showed any interest in Papadopoulos alleged offer from Mifsud of retrieving Hillary Clinton missing emails from the Russians nor did they find any evidence that the Trump campaign made any effort in following up with Papadopoulos in pursuing Hillary missing emails. Yet the Mueller investigation of Trump and his campaign continued at taxpayer expense at a cost of over 45 million dollars only to find that there was no evidence that Trump and his campaign had colluded with the Russians.

Lastly, the Mueller findings and Senate Intelligence Committee final report highlighted the issue of promoting Classified Intelligence as evidence by inferring that such evidence is there but its classified, is not evidence. If there were any classified intelligence evidence such as intercepted conversations of evidentiary value showing Trump and members of his team colluded with the Russians, you can bet that those intercepts would have been declassified by Mueller and used as evidence in a court of law.

The Facts 

Time magazine’s Feb. 15, 2021, cover story pulls back the curtain on a “conspiracy” among a “well-funded cabal of powerful people” in an “an extraordinary shadow effort” that successfully pushed Trump from office. 8

“In a way, Trump was right,” writes Time national political correspondent Molly Ball. “There was a conspiracy unfolding behind the scenes.” She later describes this “conspiracy” as something that “sounds like a paranoid fever dream — a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.” 9

NYTs after Trump acquittal issued a correction that Officer Sicknick death was not the result of being hit in the head with a fire extinguisher. 10

Trump Lawyers played the house managers video segments of President Trump speech to the crowd and Trump comments on Charlottesville that the house managers had selectively edited leaving out President Trump remarks. 11

At the moment President Trump made his comments to march peacefully a sinister group of protesters were breeching the capital. FBI investigation has determined that sinister groups had preplanned the storming the capital weeks before President Trump speech to the crowd on January 6, 2020. 12

Trump defense lawyers artfully articulated why the truth matters and exposed the media and Democratic House Managers deception to the American public by flipping the script on the house mangers by using their own doctored edited slides to show how they intentionally fabricated evidence to deceive the American public. 13

Trump defense lawyer Michael Van der Veen said in his defense presentation is that the impeachment hearings are a political trial not a court trial. Van der Veen noted the Democrats, and the media want the American public to believe they had proven their case with doctored evidence claiming they met the legal standard of sufficiency of evidence to prove President Trump incited the riot. However, as Van der Veen pointed out if this was a court of law, the house managers would be subject to disbarment and possible criminal penalties for presenting fabricated evidence in deceiving the court. 14

It’s apparent the goal of the Democratic controlled Jan 6th Congressional hearings is to set the stage in preparing the public for an indictment of former President Trump by the DOJ for crimes he didn’t commit by using guilt by association theory as evidence of a crime of conspiracy. The problem for both DOJ and the Congressional committee are twofold one being the denial of due process and two, inference that a crime of conspiracy occurred is not evidence, its hearsay and like all hearsay its fails because it cannot be properly examined or verified.

What is troubling are all the left-wing legal professionals and media pundits in their legal analysis, are purporting on twitter and other media platforms, the “Big Lie” that there is sufficiency of evidence to indict Trump, when there is not. These pundits by stoking the fear of potential violence by Trump supporters, if Trump is indicted, is totally unprofessional and unmerited as the information present thus far by the Jan 6 committee is a one side version of a Russian style show trial.

This constant theme by those on the left and the media of playing the fear card by creating a false narrative of stereotyping and vilifying Trump supporters, conservatives and republicans as racists, extremists and domestic terrorists, are a threat to the nation should set off alarm bells in the public domain. Especially when they’re no empirical evidence to support their claims of Trump supporters ever being a threat to the nation.

The actions of the Biden administration, DOJ, FBI and Homeland Security in the last year, of forming investigative domestic terrorism task forces and ministry of truth media sections within their respective agencies, establishes a pattern of corrupt activity by the Biden Administration in how they plan on justifying using the power of the state against their political opponents and citizenry which should be a concern to all American citizens.

I hope for the sake of the nation AG Garland and those in DOJ have the courage to resist the pressure by the Democrats in Congress and the Biden Administration to indict former President Trump as it would destroy the public faith in the Rule of law and divide the nation even further than it already is.

Especially in light of the fact that they’re an on-going criminal investigation by Durham where Durham has presented evidence of the conspiratorial agreement of how Fusion GPS Glen Simpson’s opposition research idea of “guilt by association with the Russians” was criminalized and weaponized by the Clinton-DNC in manufacturing and manipulating opposition research information Alfa Bank ruse for criminal purposes using the Clinton-DNC false flag disinformation dissemination false flag plan to interfere in the 2016 election and after Trump election as POTUS, continuation of the plan by the Obama administration in promoting the “Big Lie” in obstruction of the Office of the Executive branch. 15

Former Attorney General Bill Barr,” says that the Russian collusion allegations leveled against former President Donald Trump by Democrats were a “seditious” attempt to undermine his presidency and a “grave injustice.” 16

This is an opinion commentary based upon my 30 years’ experience in conducting complex conspiracy investigations and six years’ experience in conducting internal affairs investigations in connecting the dots of the greatest corruption scandal in American history to defraud the American public. It’s the final article of a series of five free sub-stack articles warning the American people of the biggest internal threat to our Republic and your personal liberties, the political weaponizations of our National Security agencies and government institutions by the party in power, the Biden Administration and the Democratic party. 17 18 19

But don’t take my word for it, take another law enforcement professional Kevin R. Brock a former assistant director of intelligence for the FBI and principal deputy director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). Brock has written two commentary articles first dated April 22, 2022, in the Hill titled “The disturbing misuse of DOJ by the Biden White House continues” and the other piece dated May 22, 2022, in Just the News titled “Ex-FBI intel chief: Clinton campaign used ‘contrived disinformation’ to deceive voters in 2016” “This is more than just political dirty tricks,” says Kevin Brock. “Political dirty tricks usually have some foundation in truth, but they just made stuff up.” Brock reached the same conclusions as to the weaponization threat to the nation. 20 21

Brock provided the following analysis and examples of the dangers of weaponization:

  • In October 2021, Biden unleashed the DOJ to intimidate parents around the country who had begun protesting school board policies that aligned with Democratic Party agendas. AG Garland dutifully issued an obsequious memo directing the FBI and U.S. attorneys to focus resources on potential acts of violence against school boards. Since there had been zero actual acts of violence associated with the parental protests, the memo was seen for what it was: a message of intimidation by a powerful department to chill speech the president’s party didn’t like. It was a gross misuse of DOJ authority.
  • November 2021, the execution of search warrants DOJ’s Southern District of New York had the FBI execute pre-dawn search warrants at two homes of Project Vertis journalists believed to be in possession of a diary belonging to Biden’s adult daughter. What isn’t clear, based on facts known publicly, is why the president’s daughter’s diary would be a matter of federal investigative interest, particularly in light of the journalists’ claimed efforts to return the diary to both Ashley Biden and law enforcement prior to the searches. 
  • April 2022, the threat made by former Biden press Jan Paski warning Alabama Republican state legislators if the bill they passed to prevent chemicals such as puberty blockers or surgeries such as castration and hysterectomy from being administered to prepubescent children, became law that they have been “put on notice” by the Department of Justice (DOJ) for possible violations of the Constitution and federal law. Brock pointed out to the public that DOJ doesn’t have the power to put lawmakers “on notice.” Brock said, DOJ swim lane simply made up by the White House; it doesn’t exist.  

Brock made several salient points in his two articles: 22 23

  • No reasonable person wants a Justice department that has daunting powers to surveil, tap and arrest people to be used simply to further one party’s policy objectives over the others. Neither the president nor the attorney general legitimately possesses such an authority.
  • The attorney general is a Cabinet member unlike any other.  While the DOJ may support certain policy goals of a president, such as an emphasis on violent crime or cyber-crime, it must maintain a healthy, independent distance from the White House. In theory, this is because no one is above the law — even the president and his staff are subject to investigation, if warranted.  
  • It’s disturbing enough that we have a president who believes there are provisions articulated in the Constitution or federal law that give teachers and doctors or other third-party adults the right to steer prepubescent children toward life-altering drugs and/or surgeries and, if deemed necessary, not tell their parents. But that we also have a president who would abuse the levers of law enforcement to intimidate any opposition to his administration’s extremist views is, perhaps, even more dangerous. 

In closing there is no better example of highlighting the danger to the Rule of Law and to the nation as articulated in a June 2022, media interview of renown civil rights Harvard Law Professor Emeritus Alan Dershowitz. 24

Alan Dershowitz made the following salient points: 25 26

  • warned former Trump adviser Peter Navarro’s arrest could impact American democracy.
  • “The Count” Navarro’s indictment was a “real scandal” given no judicial order was given for Navarro to testify that resolved his claim of executive privilege.
  • If it stands, Dershowitz said Republicans could use it in the same way their Democrat counterparts have used it against Biden administration officials.
  • “He has invoked a privilege,” Dershowitz explained. “It’s as if somebody was called to testify about what he told his priest or his doctor or his lawyer, and he invokes the privilege and immediately gets indicted, instead of the government going before a court and the judge rules whether or not the privilege applies. If you rule the privilege doesn’t apply and order him to testify, then he can be held in contempt.”
  • “But you cannot constitutionally be held in contempt of Congress without a judicial order.”
  • This is dangerous to democracy, dangerous through the rule of law, and dangerous to the concept of privilege, whether it be a priest privilege or a doctor, privileged lawyer privilege or executive privilege — an extremely dangerous case. And I’m shocked that the Justice Department brought it without there being a judicial determination that he was compelled to testify.” 27